Netflix’s brand has taken another very public beating this week with the announcement that Wal-Mart is ready to settle their portion of the current Class Action lawsuit against both of them; costing Wal-Mart approximately $27.5 million.
At issue? Allegations that Netflix and Wal-Mart may have conspired to inflate DVD rental and purchase prices, which ultimately could have boosted revenue (at customers’ expense) and stock prices between 2005 and 2011.
Netflix has decided to rigorously defend its position, citing that the suit has no merit.
You can read the actual complaints here and here. A copy of the e-mail that went out to all customers notifying them of the action can be found here.
I am not a lawyer, but I wonder where in the heck Netflix’s collective head is located these days. Can they possibly think that going to trial in front of a jury (of their customers?) with all of the negative press related to price increases (to their customers?) is going to benefit them in some way?
Per Yahoo Finance/Michael Liedtke, AP Technology Writer,
“Putting the case before a jury poses a risk to Netflix at a particularly vulnerable time. Some of the evidence in the trial will likely expose the factors that Netflix considers in setting its prices. That’s become a prickly subject since Netflix a September change that raised its rates by as much as 60 percent for customers who want to rent DVDs through the mail and view video over high-speed Internet connections.
Netflix attorneys believe the company’s recent price increase shouldn’t be mentioned during the proceedings because it might (create) prejudice the jury, according to court documents filed Tuesday.
In an overview filed in preparation for the trail, the lawyers suing Netflix allege the company overcharged its subscribers by $494 million to $654 million after the Wal-Mart agreement. If a court agreed with those amounts and decided Netflix broke federal antitrust laws in the process, the damages owed by the company could be tripled.”
Wonder how Netflix’s attorneys are going to wash their customers’ brains of the most recent 60% price increase.
In other news…
Netflix filed a 10 Q/A on November 7, 2011. In it, they say…
“In July 2011, we introduced DVD only plans and separated the unlimited DVDs by mail and unlimited streaming into separate plans. This resulted in a price increase for our members who were taking a combination of both our unlimited DVDs by mail and unlimited streaming services. We made a subsequent announcement during the quarter concerning the rebranding of our DVD by mail service as Qwikster and the separation of the Qwikster and Netflix websites.
The consumer reaction to the price change, and to a lesser degree, the branding announcement, was very negative, leading to significant customer cancellations and a decline in gross subscriber additions. We subsequently retracted our plans to rebrand our DVD by mail service and separate the DVD by mail and streaming websites. If we do not reverse the negative consumer sentiment toward our brand and if we continue to experience significant customer cancellations and a decline in subscriber additions, our results of operations including our cash flow will be adversely impacted.
Following the announcement of changes to our plan offerings, pricing, and branding in the third quarter of 2011, domestic churn increased to 6.3% for the third quarter of 2011 as compared to 4.2% in the second quarter of 2011 and 3.8% in the third quarter of 2010. This coupled with a decline in domestic gross subscriber additions of 11.3% from June 30, 2011 to September 30, 2011 resulted in negative domestic net subscriber additions of 0.8 million.
Despite the loss in domestic subscribers in the third quarter of 2011, our consolidated revenues were up 4.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, as most cancellations occurred late in the quarter. Domestic gross subscriber additions were up 18.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010, contributing to the increase in total subscribers of 49.2% as of September 30, 2011 as compared to September 30, 2010. This was the primary driver in the 48.6% increase in consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to September 30, 2010.
We expect that as a result of the increase in subscriber cancellations and migration of our subscribers towards streaming only and lower priced DVD plans, offset by increases in international revenues, consolidated revenue will be relatively flat until we can achieve positive net subscriber additions.
In the third quarter, our International segment reported a contribution loss of $23.3 million and we expect that our planned expansion to the UK and Ireland in the first quarter of 2012 will result in further losses as our investments in content in particular will exceed revenues while we grow our subscriber base. As a result of the flat consolidated revenues and the increasing investment in our International segment, we expect to incur consolidated net losses in 2012.”
.
Netflix Share Price and Trading Volume Chart
.
If you would like to review the past couple of months’ of insider stock transactions, please go here.
Today, Netflix’s close of day stock price was down to $81.18.
Yesterday, Redbox received the annual Voice of the Customer Award at Customer Response Summit III.
Just sayin’…
The stock prices tied to customer experiences case study continues.
Disclaimer – I have no financial interests in Netflix, Wal-Mart, or Redbox.
© 2011 Mary Ann Markowicz

Mary Ann Markowicz
February 13, 2012
Netflix announces settlement on class action related to Privacy and Data Collection. Closing stock price at $123.93.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/11/netflix-class-action-settlement_n_1270230.html?ref=technology
Mary Ann Markowicz
February 6, 2012
Today’s Huffington Post announces that Verizon and Redbox plan to team up and offer competitive on-demand streaming and DVD downloading services. No specifics on pricing, title selection/assortment, or timelines made public yet.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/06/verizon-redbox-ready-netflix-alternative-streaming-service_n_1257187.html
Mary Ann Markowicz
January 26, 2012
Netflix Q4 2011 Revenue Up Almost 50 Percent From Last Year
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/25/netflix-q4-2011_n_1232012.html?ref=technology
Mary Ann Markowicz
January 26, 2012
Netflix Kills Plan For Video Game Rentals
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/25/ramona-fricosu-laptop_n_1230829.html
Mary Ann Markowicz
January 25, 2012
Lots of recent Netflix news. Wonder what the Amazon move means.
Netflix revenue gains in fourth quarter
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chi-netflix-revenue-gains-in-fourth-quarter-20120125,0,2342945.story
Netflix says Amazon to launch standalone video streaming service
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chi-netflix-says-amazon-to-launch-standalone-video-streaming-service-20120125,0,3337101.story
Netflix stock jumps 11% on big streaming usage figure
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2012/01/netflix-stock-jumps-11-on-big-streaming-usage-figure.html
Mary Ann Markowicz
January 22, 2012
Reuters announces that Netflix will change its senior marketing team as follows:
Leslie Kilgore, currently Netflix’s CMO, will step down from her position in February and join its board as a non-executive director.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/20/idUS404576189420120120
Jessie Becker who is currently their VP, Marketing will become interim CMO until a new CMO can be found.
An external search is now being conducted for that external CMO.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/20/us-netflix-idUSTRE80J23120120120
Jonathan Friedland has been promoted to Chief Communications Officer and now reports directly to CEO Hastings, moving PR outside of marketing’s pervue.
Netflix (NFLX) closed Friday, January 20, 2012 on the Nasdaq at $100.24.
Analysts are expecting that Netflix’s losses will continue for awhile and that a lack of profitability will result for a period of time.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/321125-netflix-earnings-preview-expect-more-pain-ahead?source=yahoo
So the proverbial buck at Netflix stops with the CMO, not the CEO, and when stocks drop precipitously due to decision making, the CMO elegantly resigns and is moved to a Board position.
Mary Ann Markowicz
January 16, 2012
In a press release today, former SEC attorney Willie Briscoe and the securities litigation firm of Powers Taylor, LLP announced that they are investigating potential securities violations against Netflix and its Directors.
From the press release, “In a recently filed federal class action complaint, Netflix and certain of its officers and directors were charged with violating provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Specifically, the complaint alleges that defendants knew but concealed the following facts from the investing public during the Class Period: (a) Netflix had short-term contracts with content providers and defendants were aware that the company faced the choice of renegotiating the contracts in 2011 at much higher rates or not renewing them at all; (b) content providers were already demanding much higher license fees, which would dramatically alter Netflix’s business; (c) defendants recognized that Netflix’s pricing would have to dramatically increase to maintain profit margins given the streaming content costs they knew the Company would soon be incurring; and (d) Netflix was not on track to achieve the earnings forecasts made by and for the company for 2011.”
Essentially, Mr. Briscoe is saying that Netflix’s Directors did not disclose a known material change in their business when filing their annual or quarterly reports and/or knew that said changes would negatively impact earnings but hid that information from investors.
For the entire press release and article, please go to Yahoo Finance at http://finance.yahoo.com/news/netflix-investor-alert-briscoe-law-203600453.html
To read summaries of Netflix’s SEC filings and see if you agree or disagree with Mr. Briscoe… http://finance.yahoo.com/q/sec?s=NFLX+SEC+Filings
Perhaps Mr Hastings did know about these material changes but brushed them off with the brilliant ‘strategy’ of a significant price increase during a global recession?
Mary Ann Markowicz
December 28, 2011
Reuters announces today that “Netflix, Gap lag in customer satisfaction online”.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/28/us-netflix-onlinesurvey-idUSTRE7BR05I20111228
Interesting that the ONLY thing that actually changed at Netflix – after all of the very public communication missteps – was a price increase. Processes remained the same, products/services remained the same, and leadership remained the same.
So what are customers rating when they participate in the ForSee Retailer Survey? One word – PERCEPTION! It’s all about brand, delivering brand-aligned touchpoints, and in this, Reed and all of his executive team failed.
Moral of the story? Customers DON’T have short memories and PERCEPTION is reality. Emotions are EVERYTHING and ensuring that processes + touchpoints + communications + people are all ALIGNED with the brand promise is critical. Without one, the ship goes down.
Mary Ann Markowicz
December 13, 2011
The rumors this week are swirling. Will Verizon team up with Redbox to kill Netflix while Netflix is down OR will Verizon buy Netflix outright???
Read more at http://www.fool.com/investing/fiercemarkets/2011/12/13/verizons-changing-strategy-adds-netflix-acquisitio.aspx
The Service Leader
November 26, 2011
Zacks Equity Research | Zacks – Fri, Nov 25, 2011 9:15 AM EST writes on Yahoo Finance that…
“The Netflix Inc. (NasdaqGS:NFLX – News) camp will be heaving a sigh of relief, as the company has been acquitted in a class action law suit by a U.S District Judge, Phyllis Hamilton, in Oakland, California. The law suit dates back to 2009, when Netflix allied with retail giant Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE:WMT – News) to monopolize the DVD rental market, thus compelling customers to pay inflated prices for subscriptions for the period between 2005-2010.
The District Judge ruled that the agreement between Netflix and Wal-Mart (already exited the online DVD market) did not have any impact on the pricing strategy of the rentals and the two companies had not indulged in any kind of antitrust violation. Moreover, the court also suggested that Wal-Mart’s market share being insignificant, could not have had any effect on Netflix’s pricing strategy.”
For this entire article, go to… http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Netflix-Survives-Lawsuit-zacks-4214407982.html?x=0
Netflix’s stock price today? $63.86.
The Service Leader
November 26, 2011
Defecting customers continue to negatively impact Netflix…
“Nov. 22 (Bloomberg) — Netflix Inc., the video-streaming and DVD subscription service, agreed to sell $400 million in stock and convertible notes to bolster cash as it increases spending for online rights to films and TV shows.
Technology Crossover Ventures will purchase $200 million in zero-coupon senior convertible notes due 2018, and T. Rowe Price Associates Inc. funds will buy $200 million in stock, Los Gatos, California-based Netflix said yesterday in a statement.
The transactions suggest Netflix’s cash squeeze may last longer than it had anticipated, said Michael Pachter, an analyst with Wedbush Securities in Los Angeles. The company needs to spend more to make its streaming content stand out against a growing list of competitors, he said.”
For the entire article, go to… http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-11-23/netflix-raises-400-million-to-boost-cash-as-film-costs-rise.html